Is the relocation option something that’s realistic for most people, or is it not? While we can’t answer if it’s realistic in your situation, we can without a doubt state that relocating with an eye on prepping is something that few people follow through on.
We’ve been doing a lot of thinking on this subject; we’ve talked with friends about their various situations; and we’ve come to the belief that a lot of people choose to live in very bad situations because “it’s what we are used to.”
Trees grow where their seeds fall
Spice and I were riding our bicycles on the Katy Trail next to the Missouri River yesterday when she stopped and pointed to a tree that was growing from the side of a sheer rock face.
This tree’s seed had landed in a terrible spot; on a crack in a sheer cliff. But what’s a tree to do but grow where it’s planted? The tree had collapsed some time ago and was hanging down the rock face, but it was still alive, still hanging in there producing seeds, and it showed no sign whatever of “giving up the ghost”.
Of course, the thing about trees is that they can’t relocate by themselves… they can’t say “hey, this probably isn’t the best place for me to live, I should probably move out of this neighborhood and find some place not nearly so dangerous and stressful to me.”
Trees grow where their seed falls… but people are not trees…
Unlike for plants, self-relocation to get away from danger IS an option for people
We’ve talked about it in other articles like ones we’ve written about living in a flood prone area: It’s not nearly as hard for insurance companies and the government to convince most people to move out of areas that are repeatedly flooded or that are prone to other natural disasters on a regular basis.
What we find interesting, however, is those people who, no matter what, will rebuild right where they were when a disaster strikes.
Example: A couple days ago, Salty watched an interview on the Weather Channel’s website with somebody who had been burned out of his home for the second time in the last 20 years. Two complete-loss fires in 20 years and what was he talking about? Rebuilding, of course. On the exact same spot.
Some people call that persistence. We call it “he’s a slow learner”.
Options Limited As Future Earnings Consumed
Most people in America can’t afford to live a normal consumption-based lifestyle and additionally own a second property. The money won’t stretch that far for most people.
Most people in America are unwilling to give up a normal consumption-based lifestyle because that is “the norm.” Middle-class America has built a culture of social standing and status based not upon who our ancestors were (i.e. a hereditary class system) but rather we gain status among our peers by our possessions, our appearances, our job descriptions and our neighborhoods.
We keep up with the Joneses, and we in fact try our best to outdo those Jones people by having a newer car, a better-groomed yard, a two-horsepower larger lawnmower or a more elaborate Christmas light display.
All of this eats money, and in most cases it causes massive debt levels. All of this consumes options.
In a world where “normal” keeps happening, this isn’t that big of a deal.
The thing is, preppers are not counting on the world staying normal. Herein lies the problem with overconsumption of consumer goods.
Understanding The Dangers
One of the most critical task that any prepper has is to have a realistic idea of what dangers are likely to occur if and when the SHTF.
I contend that if a person knowingly lives in a flood plain, on a barrier island, in the eruption path of an active volcano (don’t just think Hawaii but also think places like around Mount Rainier in Washington where over 300,000 people live on the dad-gum slopes of the most overdue volcano in the USA)… they aren’t actually a prepper.
If people buy homes in an area like I mentioned above, where homes have been repeatedly destroyed by wildfires, they aren’t a prepper.
To us… and I admit this may well offend some people… if you live in a city (especially DEEP in a city, like in an apartment or condo) and you don’t have a bugout / relocation area all set up and ready to use at a moments notice… then while you may be a prepper, chances are if the SHTF in a big way you are not going to last very long.
Full vs. Partial Relocation
The difference between full and partial relocation may seem obvious, but there’s a lot more too it than casually meets the eye.
Spice and I live in our retreat, and yet we have “The Place” available in case we need to locate.
We also have partial relocation plans available including a livable camping bug-out vehicle and pre-arraigned places to go in other parts of the country.
Most people, no matter how potentially dangerous of a situation they live in, will not leave if the Stuff Hits The Fan in a big way. While this may be realistic for somebody who is fully prepped and hunkering down during civil unrest (not something I want to try, but it can be done) it won’t work for many types of disasters. If the house is flattened, then it’s going to be really hard to shelter in place.
BUT… We Aren’t Plants
We don’t have to stay where we are planted and just die if that place becomes uninhabitable.
The key, of course, to successful relocation at need is being prepared ahead of time… having prepared locations, having the means to get there, and getting there while the getting is good.
Are you the cedar tree, doing a great job of hanging on to an unworkably bad situation?
I’d lay long odds that brave-looking little tree won’t be there in three years. The position is just too exposed. The rock flakes off too fast; and there’s not enough water. Drought years kill off those little cliff-hugger trees in droves. The tree doesn’t have a choice; but people do.
Need to live in a city to do your job? Ok, we all need to make a living. But not all cities are created equal. Is yours in the desert, piping water long distance? Does it depend on levees to hold back the ocean? Are the roads out abundant, or are there a few chokepoint bridges everyone will by trying to use in a disaster? How many times have your neighbors had to rebuild from scratch? Maybe most importantly, do you have a realistic plan that will let you get out before things get too bad, and somewhere to go To? Strengthening the roots holding you to a waterless, exposed cliff will only take you so far.
Given the number of people who try to HOPE their way out of evacuating from a well known hurricane and being trapped by traffic OVER and OVER again I expect most people will never Bug Out successfully. They are trapped in Normalcy Bias. They can plan but they won’t test the Plan. They will have to deal with it ad hoc. Like that Tree there for the duration.
I’d like to hope you are wrong, but you are dead right. Normalcy bias kills.
Living in a rural city in NW Idaho, and having been a prepper/survivalist for years, I’ve given lots of thought to bug out/bug in. Not being too far from Spokane, Wa, and a fairly large Idaho city, and having had the occasion to be in Spokane during rush hour on normal days, and having been in traffic heading into this area FROM Spokane on both normal and holiday days, I can truly say that bugging out after a declared emergency is a pipe dream. In the event you are in Spokane, you will become a stationary object unless you abandon your car. In Idaho, if you’re able to hit the road, you will most certainly wind up caught in a massive traffic jam, no matter which road you take. Your options will be to take back roads through the woods………unless it’s winter, then it will be shanks mare or snowmobile time. I DON’T believe there are very many people capable of making it very far on foot or snow shoes, maybe skis, in inclement weather. Not to be a spoil sport, just a realist. My “stuff” is here, I can’t afford and don’t have an alternate location, but wish I did and am working on it, I am very cognizant of the fact that no one is going to be able to go it alone but the thought of sharing my secret spot with any other than family dregs up thoughts of Lucifers Hammer! So I guess I’m here, probably for te duration!
I have been studying this prepping/survivalist matter for years. I am leading a survival plan for a rural community of believers and recommend “the civil defense book” to anyone who will listen. Also involved in local hospital plan.
This all comes down to a triage situation. Most people will be “dead man walking”. Some people will have minor issues (those who prepare) and are maybe 10% of population. Then there are those who could survive if they get to help soon enough (having a successful bug out plan).
All that equals the 90/10 numbers of who will die in a major lights out world. Sadly, the more who die off the better the chances of those who survive. In our situation we have a population of 20,000 or so spread out in clusters over a valley area of 25 miles. Over half survive on a government (at some level) income. Many commute to jobs 50 to 100 miles away. The only ones who will survive are those 10% who are preparing and a few who will and can make major changes to their lifestyle. Our plan is to survive the die off why we develop our sustainable food production. It will be close as the numbers on food to survive a year to then be feeding ourselves is close to half a million dollars. Sadly our only chance of surviving is the sheep mentality who will starve and die off. The math of who survives and who doesn’t is all about food and how fast we can replace it. Add in the need for protection and the math of what percentage of the group that takes.
It all comes down to planning and acting now. One second after is a lifetime too late.